Wood v. Moulton
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
Defendants are the owners of a large tract of land. Plaintiff’s land (twenty acres in extent) is contiguous to, and lower in elevation than, defendants’ land. It is charged that defendants in preparing their land for cultivation changed the course of surface water which in times of rain accumulated in a ravine in the hills upon their property, erected an embankment across the original wash which these surface waters followed, and constructed a new channel for them to the canal of the Riverside Water Company. The result was, that under a heavy, rainfall the waters rushed over the land and down…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Learned v. CastleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Los Angeles Cemetery Ass'n v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- McDaniel v. CummingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Chalmers v. SheehyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Sanguinetti v. PockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Zibbell v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
- People v. FerlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- San Gabriel Valley Country Club v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Sheffet v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Hinman v. Pacific Air TransportCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.