Legal Opinion

Hinman v. Pacific Air Transport

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 20, 1936No. 7810, 7811PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HANEY, Circuit Judge.

From decrees sustaining motions to dismiss filed by defendants in two suits, appellants appeal and bring for review by this court the rights of a landowner in connection with the flight of aircraft above his land. Appellant filed one bill against Pacific Air Transport, an Oregon corporation, and another bill against United Air Lines Transport Corporation, a Delaware corporation, in each of which the allegations are nearly identical. Although two appeals are before the court, briefs filed discuss both cases, and therefore we will cpnsider them together.

Appellants filed a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Portsmouth Harbor Land & Hotel Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Kafka v. BozioCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Case v. MinotMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1893
  4. Wood v. MoultonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Grandona v. LovdalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. United States v. CausbySupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Gardner v. Allegheny CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  3. Allegheny Airlines, Inc., Civil Aeronautics Board and Administrator of Civil Aeronautics, Intervenors-Appellees v. Village of CedarhurstCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
  4. Chance v. BP Chemicals, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Yoffee v. Pennsylvania Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API