Legal Opinion

McDaniel v. Cummings

California Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1890No. 13173PublishedCited by 44 opinions

Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Colusa County dissolving an injunction. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtBeatty, C. J.

Defendant owns the west half of a certain section, No. 26, in Colusa County. Plaintiff owns land adjoining on the west. Still farther to the west, at a distance of about two miles from plaintiff’s land, the Sacramento River flows from north to south. The land next the river is the highest, there being a gradual descent from the river bank to and beyond the land of defendant. When the river rises above the level of its banks, — as it generally does several times during every rainy season, — the water flows off to the east or southeast across the land of plaintiff, and other lands similarly…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lamb v. Reclamation District No. 108California Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Ogburn v. ConnorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Gray v. Reclamation District No. 1500California Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Clement v. State Reclamation BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Belair v. Riverside County Flood Control DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  4. San Gabriel Valley Country Club v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Martin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API