Sanguinetti v. Pock
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion. R. W. Dodge, A. H. Carpenter, and Carpenter & Flack, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the Court
CHIPMAN, C.
Action to have a certain levee constructed by defendant declared to be a nuisance and for damages. A jury was called to determine certain special issues and the court also made findings of fact. The following diagram will illustrate the facts:—
Summarized from the findings, it appears that plaintiff and defendant own adjoining lands, as shown by the diagram; a natural waterway passes through these lands; its course is from east to west, and it extends eastward some distance east of the Mariposa road and westward through defendant’s land, and “in its natural condition was sufficient…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Lamb v. Reclamation District No. 108California Supreme Court · 1887
- Los Angeles Cemetery Ass'n v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- McDaniel v. CummingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- De Baker v. Southern California RailwayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Gray v. McWilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Archer v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Gray v. Reclamation District No. 1500California Supreme Court · 1917
- Maricopa County Municipal Water Conservation District Number One v. Southwest Cotton Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1931
- Lebrun v. RichardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Horton v. GoodenoughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.