Martinique Shoes, Inc. v. New York Progressive Wood Heel Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Montgomery, J.,
New York Progressive Wood Heel Company (Progressive) appeals from a judgment entered against it in favor of Martinique Shoes, Inc. (Martinique), in an action of assumpsit for indemnity for losses allegedly sustained from-a breach of warranty in the sale of the heel of a shoe. Defendant’s motion for judgment n.o.v. and a new trial were refused. Martinique had affixed the heel in question to a shoe it manufactured and sold to William Hahn & Company, Inc. (Hahn). Eventually the shoe was bought from Hahn by a Mrs. Witt, who upon the occasion of her first wearing of it *406was…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Pittsburgh Steel Co. v. Patterson-Emerson-Comstock, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
- Tugboat Indian Co. v. A/S Ivarans RederiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Orth v. Consumers Gas Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- Renschler v. PizanoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Wise Shoes, Inc. v. BlattSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Brakeman v. Potomac Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Neville Chemical Company v. Union Carbide CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- Philadelphia Electric Company v. Hercules, Inc. And Gould, Inc. Appeal of Hercules, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Burbage v. Boiler Engineering & Supply Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
- Molett v. Penrod Drilling Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.