Legal Opinion

Pittsburgh Steel Co. v. Patterson-Emerson-Comstock, Inc.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 25, 1961No. Appeal, 149PublishedCited by 88 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Bell,

This appeal was taken from the judgment non obstante veredicto in favor of the defendant and additional defendant in an action of assumpsit. Plaintiff, Pittsburgh Steel Company, the present appellant, owned the property on which the construction was taking place. Plaintiff seeks indemnity for a sum it had been required to pay in settling an earlier action brought by an employee of the additional defendant (Eichleay Corporation) against plaintiff-appellant.

Originally the plaintiff entered into a contract with defendant-Patterson for the installation by defendant of a…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Builders Supply Co. v. McCabeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  2. Perry v. PayneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
  3. Maio v. FahsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  4. McDonald v. Levinson Steel Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  5. Mynard v. Syracuse, Binghamton & New York RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1877

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by88 opinions

  1. Neville Chemical Company v. Union Carbide CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
  2. Clement v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
  3. Walton v. Avco Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Dilks v. Flohr ChevroletSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  5. Ruzzi v. Butler Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API