Legal Opinion

Molett v. Penrod Drilling Co.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided September 15, 1987No. 86-4665PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALVIN B. RUBIN, Circuit Judge:

The seller of a chain compromised a liability suit against it and seeks indemnity from the manufacturer of the chain pursuant to its third party demand in that suit. The district court held that the chain was defective, and the seller who marketed the chain under its own name was entitled to indemnification from the manufacturer of the chain but not to contribution from the owner of the barge on which the accident occurred. Both the manufacturer and the seller appealed. We hold that the manufacturer must fully indemnify the seller for the amount reasonably paid…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. East River Steamship Corp. v. Transamerica Delaval Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Executive Jet Aviation, Inc. v. City of ClevelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Scindia Steam Navigation Co. v. De Los SantosSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Foremost Insurance v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Jerome B. Grubart, Inc. v. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Cates v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
  3. Torres v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Cates v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
  5. Federal Deposit Insurance v. MassingillCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API