Legal Opinion

Renschler v. Pizano

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 26, 1938No. Appeal, 45PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Schaffer,

There is here presented a quest for a remedy against a wrong which cannot be disputed, if the allegations of appellant are true. It is garnishee in an attachment proceeding, and seeks to establish that the judgment on which the attachment was issued had been improperly obtained. It claims an application to open the judgment is the only available and adequate remedy afforded, and accordingly filed a petition to bring about this result. On the other hand, appellee, plaintiff in the judgment, asserts that his garnishee antagonist has a complete and adequate remedy…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Orth v. Consumers Gas Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  2. West v. MacMillan (Et Al.)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  3. Philadelphia v. Reading Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  4. Philadelphia v. BergdollSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  5. Wright Et Ux. v. ScrantonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Neville Chemical Company v. Union Carbide CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
  2. Butterfield v. GiuntoliSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. PaynterCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
  4. Strickland Ex Rel. Steed v. HughesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  5. Aetna Life & Casualty Co. v. McCabeDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1983

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API