Legal Opinion

Philadelphia Electric Company v. Hercules, Inc. And Gould, Inc. Appeal of Hercules, Inc

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided June 18, 1985No. 84-1159PublishedCited by 190 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

A. LEON HIGGINBOTHAM, Jr., Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a final judgment of the district court in favor of Philadelphia Electric Company (“PECO”) and against Hercules, Inc. (“Hercules”) in the amount of $394,910.14, and further ordering Hercules to take all appropriate action to eliminate pollution on a property owned by PECO in Chester, Pennsylvania. The case was tried to a jury on theories of public and private nuisance. For the reasons set forth in the opinion that follows, we will reverse the judgment against Hercules on PECO’s claims, and vacate the injunction.

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Dawejko v. Jorgensen Steel Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. ELDERKIN Et Ux. v. GasterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  3. Charles Travis and Jean Travis v. Harris Corp., Harris-Intertype Corporation, Sheridan Division and Bruno MacHinery CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
  4. Burbage v. Boiler Engineering & Supply Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  5. Husak v. Berkel, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by190 opinions

  1. Donald v. Amoco Production Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Ingersoll Milling Machine Co. v. M/V BodenaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
  3. Berg Chilling Systems, Inc. v. Hull Corporation Sp Industries, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
  4. Rosenblatt v. Exxon Co., U.S.A.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  5. Cargo Partner Ag v. Albatrans, Inc. And Chase, Leavitt (Customhouse Brokers) Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003

185 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API