Legal Opinion

Burbage v. Boiler Engineering & Supply Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 24, 1969No. Appeal, 156PublishedCited by 120 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Jones,

On September 9, 1963, while engaged in employment with Friedman and Sons, Inc., Edmund Burbage (decedent) was killed when a boiler exploded. This boiler, manufactured by Boiler Engineering and Supply Company, Inc. (Boiler), contained a valve manufactured by General Controls, Inc. (General). This valve was not part of the original boiler but was sold as a replacement unit for a boiler which was already in existence. The explosion occurred when General’s valve stuck in the open position, permitting an excessive amount of fuel to enter the ignition chamber. The…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Builders Supply Co. v. McCabeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  2. Robert D. Putman v. Erie City Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
  3. Bonnie Lee Jamieson Deveny, B.N.F. Frank Jamieson, and Frank Jamieson v. Rheem Manufacturing Company, Robertshaw Fulton Controls CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
  4. Milford Borough v. BurnettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  5. Kalyvas v. KalyvasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by120 opinions

  1. Com., Dept. of Transp. v. O'CONNELLSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  2. Tincher, T. v. Omega Flex, Inc., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. Kuisis v. Baldwin-Lima-Hamilton Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. Commonwealth v. GarvinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  5. Philadelphia Electric Company v. Hercules, Inc. And Gould, Inc. Appeal of Hercules, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985

115 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API