Legal Opinion

Wise Shoes, Inc. v. Blatt

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 5, 1932No. Appeal 240PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Stadteeld, J.,

This is an action of assumpsit brought by Wise Shoes, Inc., against Philip Blatt to recover over from the latter the amount of a judgment recovered against it in an action of trespass brought by a third party for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained.

Plaintiff’s statement avers that plaintiff is engaged in business maintaining a store at Eleventh and Chestnut Streets in the City of Philadelphia; that defendant is an independent contractor, and on the 5th day of January, 1928, entered into an oral contract with plaintiff company to clean certain windows on…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Dunn v. . Uvalde Asphalt Paving Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1903
  2. Scott v. . CurtisNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
  3. Conner v. . ReevesNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  4. Orth v. Consumers Gas Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  5. Kansas City, Memphis & Birmingham Railroad v. Southern Railway News Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1899

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Neville Chemical Company v. Union Carbide CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
  2. Jones v. Waterman SS CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1946
  3. Globe Indemnity Co. v. SchmittOhio Supreme Court · 1944
  4. San Francisco Unified School District v. California Building Maintenance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1958
  5. Tugboat Indian Co. v. A/S Ivarans RederiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API