Legal Opinion
Contracts Materials Processing, Inc. v. Kataleuna GmbH Catalysts
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided September 18, 2001No. AMD 98-147PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
DAVIS, District Judge.
The plaintiff, Contract Materials Processing, Inc. (“CMP”), instituted this damages action against KataLeuna GmbH Catalysts (“KataLeuna”), Tricat Management GmbH (“Tricat”) and Tricat Catalytic Products (“TCP”), alleging breach of contract, misappropriation and conversion. 1 Jurisdiction is based on diversity of citizenship. KataLeuna has asserted several counterclaims against CMP. 2 The conversion claims have previously been dismissed. 3
Now pending is the defendants’ motion for partial summary judgment as to plaintiffs remaining claims. Related to this motion…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Christine Evans v. Technologies Applications & Service CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
- Ruckelshaus v. Monsanto Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- BDT Products, Inc. v. Lexmark International, Inc.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2003
- Contract Materials Processing, Inc. v. Kataleuna GmbH CatalystsDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2002
- Glass v. Anne Arundel CountyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2014
- Quesenberry v. Volvo Group North America, Inc.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2010
- Contract Materials Processing, Inc. v. KataLeuna GmbH CatalystsDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.