Legal Opinion
BDT Products, Inc. v. Lexmark International, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Kentucky
Decided July 31, 2003No. 5:03-misc-00016PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
HOOD, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Defendant Lexmark International, Inc.’s (“Lexmark’s”) motions for summary judgment [Record Nos. 304 & 305]. Fully briefed, Defendant’s motions are ripe for review.
I. RELEVANT FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
The following are the relevant facts, viewed — as they must — in the light most favorable to plaintiff.
Plaintiffs (collectively “BDT”) are experts in the design and manufacture of paper handling systems and, as such, have solved difficult paper-handling challenges for the largest printer companies in the…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ruckelshaus v. Monsanto Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Cleveland v. Policy Management Systems Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- BDT Products, Inc. v. Lexmark International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
- Government Employees Insurance Co. v. NealeyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
- Central Illinois Light Company v. Consolidation Coal CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- Alph C. Kaufman, Inc. v. Cornerstone Indus. Corp.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 2017
- Papa John's International, Inc. v. RezkoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2006
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.