Quesenberry v. Volvo Group North America, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JAMES P. JONES, Chief Judge.
This opinion sets forth more fully the reasons for my rulings made at trial on the defendants’ objections to certain of the plaintiffs’ witnesses and exhibits, on the grounds that the witnesses had not been disclosed in a timely fashion and the exhibits constituted inadmissible hearsay.
I
This class action, commenced on January 21, 2009, concerns a dispute over retired union workers’ medical benefits. The plaintiffs are union workers who retired between 2000 and 2007 from New River Valley Assembly Plant in Dublin, Virginia (the “NRV Plant”), their spouses, and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Southern States Rack and Fixture, Incorporated v. Sherwin-Williams Company, and Keller Rigging & Construction Sc, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Joseph Brooks Robinson, United States of America v. Stanley Leon Obanion, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2002
- Carr v. DeedsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2006
- Contracts Materials Processing, Inc. v. Kataleuna GmbH CatalystsDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2001
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hartford Fire Ins. v. Sambrano (In Re Sambrano)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas · 2010
- EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION v. TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT GROUPDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2025
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. St. Joseph's/Candler Health System, Inc.District Court, S.D. Georgia · 2022
- Geoshack Canada Company v. HendriksDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2021
- The Estate of RICHIE MAJORS v. GERLACHDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2022
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.