Legal Opinion

Ruckelshaus v. Monsanto Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 26, 1984No. 83-196PublishedCited by 1,394 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Blackmun

In this case, we are asked to review a United States District Court’s determination that several provisions of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA), 61 Stat. 163, as amended, 7 U. S. C. § 136 et seq., are unconstitutional. The provisions at issue authorize the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to use data submitted by an applicant for registration of a pesticide1 in evaluating the application of a subsequent applicant, and to disclose publicly some of the submitted data.

Over the past century, the use of pesticides to control weeds and minimize crop damage caused…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  4. Duke Power Co. v. Carolina Environmental Study Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Morton v. MancariSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1,394 opinions

  1. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. St. CyrSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. United States v. VonnSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Nollan v. California Coastal CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

1,389 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API