Legal Opinion
Contract Materials Processing, Inc. v. Kataleuna GmbH Catalysts
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided September 19, 2002No. CIV. AMD-98-147PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
DAVIS, District Judge.
Under the Maryland Uniform Trade Secrets Act, Md.Code Ann.Com.Law §§ 11-1201, et seq. (sometimes hereinafter “the MUTSA”), attorney’s fees may be recovered against a party which institutes and/or maintains a claim for misappropriation of trade secrets in bad faith. Now pending, inter alia, is defendants’ motion for an award of attorney’s fees under MUTSA. For the reasons discussed herein, the motion shall be granted and I shall award fees in the amount of $134,945.
I
The amended complaint in this diversity action alleged claims for misappropriation of trade…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Roadway Express, Inc. v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Jurldine A. Donaldson v. Paul v. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
- In Re Kunstler.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Degussa Admixtures, Inc. v. BurnettDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2007
- McKesson Medical-Surgical, Inc. v. Micro Bio-Medics, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2003
- Sun Media Systems, Inc. v. KDSM, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 2008
- Krafft v. DowneySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Conxall Corporation v. Iconn Systems, LLCAppellate Court of Illinois · 2016
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.