Addiego v. Hill
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.
Defendants appeal from a judgment decreeing specific performance of a written agreement to sell their controlling shares of stock in a closed corporation to plaintiffs, and from a post-judgment injunction. They contend that: 1) the agreement enforced by the court violates the stat ute of frauds; 2) plaintiffs did not exercise their preemptive rights in time;- 3) the trial court erred in the exclusion of certain evidence; 4) specific performance cannot be had because title to the stock had passed to a third party; and 5) the trial court abused its discretion in granting the post-judgment…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Lewis & Queen v. N. M. Ball SonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Rodriguez v. BarnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Searles v. GonzalezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Addiego v. HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Sibert v. ShaverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Groves v. PrickettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- Conaway v. 20th Century Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Colt v. FradkinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
- Seck v. FoulksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Groves v. PrickettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.