Legal Opinion
DRG/Beverly Hills, Ltd. v. Chopstix Dim Sum Cafe and Takeout III, Ltd.
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 16, 1994No. B065620PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
STOEVER, J. *
Plaintiff appeals from a judgment entered in favor of defendant after jury verdict.
On or about March 17, 1989, appellant DRG/Beverly Hills, Ltd. (hereinafter DRG), as lessor, and respondent Chopstix Dim Sum Cafe & Takeout III, Ltd., through its general partner, Chopstix III, Inc. (hereinafter collectively Chopstix), as lessee, entered into a written lease agreement for premises to be occupied by lessee’s restaurant/bar business.
Respondents Epsteen, Milham and Benun (hereinafter Guarantors) each individually guaranteed Chopstix’s performance under the aforementioned lease…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Liodas v. SahadiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Insurance Co. of the West v. Haralambos Beverage Co.California Court of Appeal · 1987
- BP Alaska Exploration, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- City of Ukiah v. FonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- Weiner v. FleischmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Waller v. Truck Insurance Exchange, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1995
- Lantzy v. Centex HomesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- Ringler Associates Inc. v. Maryland Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 2000
- Couveau v. American Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Bickel v. City of PiedmontCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.