Legal Opinion

Balestrieri v. Sullivan

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 18, 1956No. Civ. 16745PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKaufman, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court in and for the City and County of San Francisco in favor of respondents granting a mandatory injunction enjoining appellants from maintaining a certain fence and ordering the removal thereof, and for general damages in the sum of $500.

Respondents, Salvatore and Josephine Balestrieri, husband and wife, filed their first amended complaint on November 19, 1952, for mandatory injunction for a continuing trespass, alleging that a fence built and maintained by defendants along the northeast boundary of appellants’ land extends and encroaches…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Sorensen v. CostaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Carlson v. LindauerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  3. Los Angeles Brick & Clay Products Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  4. Dooling v. DabelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  5. Wallace v. WhitmoreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Chandler v. HibberdCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  2. Hunter v. CroysdillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  3. Memory Gardens of Las Vegas, Inc. v. Pet Ponderosa Memorial Gardens, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Schoenfeld v. PritzkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  5. Hunter v. CroysdillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API