Legal Opinion

Sorensen v. Costa

California Supreme Court

Decided August 24, 1948No. Sac. 5842PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTraynor, J.

Appellant, Manuel F. Costa, appeals from a judgment in favor of plaintiff and respondent, Ernest T. Sorensen, determining the latter to be the owner of a lot described as “The Westerly one-half of Lot 7, Block 51, Benicia, California, as the same is laid down and delineated on the Official Map of the City of Benicia.”

According to the evidence and the findings of the trial court, this litigation arose out of a “general mistake existing as to the proper description of several lots lying in and upon block fifty-one as shown on the Official Map of the City of Benicia, California.” For many years…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Montecito Valley Water Co. v. City of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. City & County of San Francisco v. County of San MateoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. West v. EvansCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Allen v. McKay & Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Park v. PowersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. J. Bryant Kasey and Maryann Kasey v. Molybdenum Corporation of America, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
  2. Beneficial Life Ins. Co. v. WakamatsuIdaho Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Family Service Agency of Santa Barbara v. AmesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  4. Alaska National Bank v. LinckAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Windsor Pacific LLC v. Samwood Co.California Court of Appeal · 2013

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API