Carlson v. Lindauer
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
VALLÉE, J.
Appeal by defendants-cross-complainants, referred to as defendants, from a judgment for plaintiffs entered on an order sustaining demurrers to the answer and to the cross-complaint without leave to amend and on an order granting plaintiffs’ motion for judgment on the pleadings in suit to quiet title to realty.
The complaint is in the usual form of one to quiet title. Defendants answered and filed a cross-complaint. Plaintiffs demurred to the answer on the grounds it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a defense, and that the defense is barred by the provisions of section…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Callahan v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Stanislaus Water Co. v. BachmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- MacIsaac v. PozzoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Dabney-Johnston Oil Corp. v. WaldenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Ephraim v. Metropolitan Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1946
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Basin Oil Co. v. Baash-Ross Tool Co.California Court of Appeal · 1954
- City of Manhattan Beach v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- Lubin v. LubinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Hardy v. Admiral Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1961
- Stafford v. BallingerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.