Legal Opinion

Hunter v. Croysdill

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 1, 1959No. Civ. 23324PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFox, P. J.

Defendant Mark C. Crawford 1 appeals from a judgment entered in plaintiffs’ favor in their action to recover money due for credit extended to an ostensible partnership. The plaintiffs appeal on the issue of the extent of the defendant’s liability.

Crawford’s Appeal

The plaintiffs are partners in the firm of Quinco Tool Products and manufacture, in Detroit, Michigan, a line of cutting tools which are sold to distributors or dealers. For some six years defendant had been the sole owner of M. C. Crawford Company, a tool component supply business in Los Angeles, California. One Keith B. Croysdill…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Grainger v. AntoyanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Valencia v. Shell Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Vitagraph, Inc. v. Liberty Theatres Co.California Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Pacific Finance Corp. v. FoustCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Gray v. American Surety Co. of New YorkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Davies v. KrasnaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. State Department of Health Services v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Mass v. Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Sackett v. SpindlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  5. Humboldt Livestock Auction, Inc. v. B & H CATTLE CO.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1967

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API