Legal Opinion

Dooling v. Dabel

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 17, 1947No. Civ. 7396PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

Plaintiffs brought suit to quiet title to an easement in a roadway across defendants’ farm, claimed to have been acquired by prescriptive use for a period of more than five years. The trial court adopted findings to the effect that plaintiffs traveled the roadway by mere permission of the owners, and therefore acquired no prescriptive title thereto. Judgment was accordingly rendered against plaintiffs. From that judgment this appeal was perfected.

It is contended that the findings and judgment are not supported by the evidence. No other issue is raised on this appeal.

Defendants’ predecessors…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Clarke v. ClarkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Crockett Land & Cattle Co.California Court of Appeal · 1924
  3. Fleming v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Conaway v. ToogoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Jensen v. GerrardUtah Supreme Court · 1935

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Western Aggregates, Inc. v. County of YubaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  2. Warsaw v. Chicago Metallic Ceilings, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Bartholomew v. StaheliCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  4. Guerra v. PackardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  5. Allen v. First National BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1949

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API