Legal Opinion

Hunter v. Croysdill

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 1, 1959No. Civ. No. 23324Published

1Opinion of the Court

169 Cal.App.2d 307 (1959)

HOMER HUNTER et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants,

v.

KEITH B. CROYSDILL et al., Defendants; MARK C. CRAWFORD, Defendant and Appellant.

Civ. No. 23324.

California Court of Appeals. Second Dist., Div. Two.

Apr. 1, 1959.

Stone & Moran, Hugh A. Moran III, Robert W. Anderson and Willard J. Stone for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Leslie C. Tupper, Leo J. Pircher and Lawler, Felix & Hall for Defendant and Appellant.

FOX, P. J.

Defendant Mark C. Crawford [fn. 1] appeals from a judgment entered in plaintiffs' favor in their action to recover money due for credit extended to an ostensible…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Grainger v. AntoyanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Valencia v. Shell Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Vitagraph, Inc. v. Liberty Theatres Co.California Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Hunter v. CroysdillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  5. Pacific Finance Corp. v. FoustCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API