Legal Opinion

Rosecrans v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided February 17, 1943No. L. A. 18171PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.

— Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of dismissal entered upon an order sustaining a demurrer to their complaint.

Plaintiffs are the successors in interest of Carl F. and Lillian T. Rosecrans, husband and wife, who were the grantors in a deed dated September 17, 1907, which conveyed to H. E. Huntington, the predecessor of defendant, Pacific Electric Railway Company, a corporation, a right of way for a railroad across the real property therein described. It is stated in said deed that for the consideration of $1 and other valuable consideration, the grantors grant to the grantee the right of way…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Knight v. BlackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
  2. McBride v. FreemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Firth v. MarovichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  4. People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Fitzgerald v. County of ModocCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Faus v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Tamalpais Land & Water Co. v. Northwestern Pacific RailroadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  3. Walton v. City of Red BluffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  4. Russell v. Palos Verdes PropertiesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. Boughton v. Socony Mobil Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1964

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API