Legal Opinion

Boughton v. Socony Mobil Oil Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 14, 1964No. Civ. 28159PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLillie, J.

Plaintiffs, owners of a parcel of real property, sued to have the court declare a restriction prohibiting the dispensing of petroleum products thereon to be invalid and unenforceable. It having been stipulated under defendant’s motion for summary judgment to dismiss the complaint under section 437c, Code of Civil Procedure, judgment was entered for defendant adjudging the restriction to be valid and enforceable against plaintiffs; they appeal therefrom.

On June 22, 1959, General Petroleum Corporation, by corporation grant deed, conveyed to Kelley and Clark as tenants in common a parcel of real…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Smith v. San Francisco & North Pacific Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Knight v. BlackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
  3. Firth v. MarovichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Pacific Wharf & Storage Co. v. Standard American Dredging Co.California Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Fitzgerald v. County of ModocCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Edwards v. Arthur Andersen LLPCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Scott v. Snelling and Snelling, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1990
  3. The Retirement Group v. GalanteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  4. International Business MacHines Corporation v. Dr. Christopher H. Bajorek, Chris Bajorek v. International Business MacHines CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  5. Centeno v. Roseville Community HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API