Legal Opinion

People v. Schmitz

California Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 2012No. S186707PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CORRIGAN, J.

This case involves the constitutional limits of a vehicle search based on a passenger’s parole status. Here, an officer, aware that the front seat passenger was on parole, searched the backseat of defendant’s car and recovered drugs and drug paraphernalia from a chips bag and a pair of shoes. Defendant, the driver, sought to suppress that evidence. We conclude that the search was reasonable under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution. We hold that the Constitution permits a search of those areas of the passenger compartment where the officer reasonably…

2Cases cited56 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. People v. HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  2. People v. BuzaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
  3. People v. MacabeoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
  4. United States v. Lambert GrandberryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  5. People v. VargasCalifornia Supreme Court · 2020

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API