People v. Buza
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtKruger, J.
**1135 *684 *664 In 2004, California voters passed Proposition 69 (Prop. 69, as approved by voters, Gen. Elec. (Nov. 2, 2004); known as the "DNA Fingerprint, Unsolved Crime and Innocence Protection Act" (DNA Act) ) to expand existing requirements for the collection of DNA identification information for law enforcement purposes. The DNA Act requires law enforcement officials to collect DNA samples, as well as fingerprints, from all persons who are arrested for, as well as those who have been convicted of, felony offenses. ( Pen. Code, § 296.1, subd. (a)(1)(A).)
Defendant Mark Buza was arrested for…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited91 opinions
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- People v. Dueñas, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- People v. HardyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
- People v. SotoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
- People v. C.B. (In Re C.B.)California Supreme Court · 2018
- People v. LemckeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2021
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.