Legal Opinion

People v. Harris

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 19, 2015No. E060962PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

McKINSTER, Acting P. J.

I

INTRODUCTION

In Missouri v. McNeely (2013) 569 U.S._[185 L.Ed.2d 696, 133 S.Ct. 1552] (McNeely), the United States Supreme Court held that, before the police may conduct a nonconsensual blood test of a motorist who is arrested on suspicion of driving under the influence (DUI) of alcohol, the police must either obtain a warrant from a detached magistrate or later show that exigent circumstances prevented them from timely obtaining a warrant. (569 U.S. at p. _ [133 S.Ct. at p. 1563].) The high court also held that the natural dissipation of alcohol in a driver’s…

2Cases cited62 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2015
  2. State of Tennessee v. Corrin Kathleen ReynoldsTennessee Supreme Court · 2016
  3. State of Iowa v. Dale Dean Pettijohn Jr.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2017
  4. State v. Yong Shik WonHawaii Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Espinoza v. ShiomotoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API