People v. Harris
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
McKINSTER, Acting P. J.
I
INTRODUCTION
In Missouri v. McNeely (2013) 569 U.S._[185 L.Ed.2d 696, 133 S.Ct. 1552] (McNeely), the United States Supreme Court held that, before the police may conduct a nonconsensual blood test of a motorist who is arrested on suspicion of driving under the influence (DUI) of alcohol, the police must either obtain a warrant from a detached magistrate or later show that exigent circumstances prevented them from timely obtaining a warrant. (569 U.S. at p. _ [133 S.Ct. at p. 1563].) The high court also held that the natural dissipation of alcohol in a driver’s…
2Cases cited62 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2015
- State of Tennessee v. Corrin Kathleen ReynoldsTennessee Supreme Court · 2016
- State of Iowa v. Dale Dean Pettijohn Jr.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2017
- State v. Yong Shik WonHawaii Supreme Court · 2015
- Espinoza v. ShiomotoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.