People v. Macabeo
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CORRIGAN, J.
In People v. Diaz (2011) 51 Cal.4th 84 [119 Cal.Rptr.3d 105, 244 P.3d 501] (Diaz), we held that, incident to a custodial arrest, police may search through data on a defendant’s cellular phone without obtaining a warrant. The United States Supreme Court subsequently held to the contrary in Riley v. California (2014) 573 U.S._ [189 L.Ed.2d 430, 134 S.Ct. 2473] (Riley). We conclude the warrantless search of defendant Paul Macabeo’s phone would not have been proper even under our decision in Diaz, and a reasonably well-trained officer would have so known. Under these…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- New York v. BeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- United States v. DiazCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017
- People v. FayedCalifornia Supreme Court · 2020
- People v. BuzaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
- State v. LeeIdaho Supreme Court · 2017
- People v. OviedaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.