Legal Opinion

People v. Macabeo

California Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 2016No. S221852PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CORRIGAN, J.

In People v. Diaz (2011) 51 Cal.4th 84 [119 Cal.Rptr.3d 105, 244 P.3d 501] (Diaz), we held that, incident to a custodial arrest, police may search through data on a defendant’s cellular phone without obtaining a warrant. The United States Supreme Court subsequently held to the contrary in Riley v. California (2014) 573 U.S._ [189 L.Ed.2d 430, 134 S.Ct. 2473] (Riley). We conclude the warrantless search of defendant Paul Macabeo’s phone would not have been proper even under our decision in Diaz, and a reasonably well-trained officer would have so known. Under these…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. New York v. BeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. United States v. DiazCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017
  2. People v. FayedCalifornia Supreme Court · 2020
  3. People v. BuzaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
  4. State v. LeeIdaho Supreme Court · 2017
  5. People v. OviedaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API