Legal Opinion

Schneckloth v. Bustamonte

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 29, 1973No. 71-732PublishedCited by 10,347 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stewart

It is well settled under the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments that a search conducted without a warrant issued upon probable cause is “per se unreasonable . . . subject only to a few specifically established and well-delineated exceptions.” Katz v. United States, 389 U. S. 347, 357; Coolidge v. New Hampshire, 403 U. S. 443, 454-455; Chambers v. Maroney, 399 U. S. 42, 51. It is equally well settled that one of the specifically established exceptions to the requirements of both a warrant and probable cause is a search that is conducted pursuant to consent. Davis v. United States, 328 U. S. 582,…

2Cases cited108 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938

103 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10,347 opinions

  1. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

10,342 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API