Schneckloth v. Bustamonte
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stewart
It is well settled under the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments that a search conducted without a warrant issued upon probable cause is “per se unreasonable . . . subject only to a few specifically established and well-delineated exceptions.” Katz v. United States, 389 U. S. 347, 357; Coolidge v. New Hampshire, 403 U. S. 443, 454-455; Chambers v. Maroney, 399 U. S. 42, 51. It is equally well settled that one of the specifically established exceptions to the requirements of both a warrant and probable cause is a search that is conducted pursuant to consent. Davis v. United States, 328 U. S. 582,…
2Cases cited108 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
103 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10,347 opinions
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
10,342 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.