Legal Opinion
United States v. Lambert Grandberry
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 17, 2013No. 11-50498PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge BERZON; Concurrence by Judge WATFORD; Concurrence by Judge BERZON.
OPINION
BERZON, Circuit Judge:
After police officers arrested Lambert Grandberry, they decided to search a nearby apartment Grandberry had entered several times—at least six—in recent days. The officers relied on Grandberry’s status as a parolee as their authority to search the apartment and so did not obtain a warrant. We must address whether the police complied with our precedents requiring that officers have probable cause to conclude that a parolee lives at an address before carrying out a warrantless search…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Michael Lacey v. Joseph ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Minnesota v. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Miller v. GammieCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. WattsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Damian Langere v. Verizon Wireless ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- United States v. Steven CervantesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Anthony PedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- United States v. Travis BarnesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Kyle KorteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.