Legal Opinion

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Jones

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 6, 1992No. OSB 90-4, 90-97; SC S38439PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

In this lawyer disciplinary proceeding, the Oregon State Bar charged the accused with 12 violations of disciplinary rules in five causes of complaint. The first three causes of complaint concern the failure of the accused to appear in behalf of clients during the summer of 1989. The fourth cause alleges that the accused failed to cooperate with the Bar’s investigation into that conduct. The fifth cause charges the accused with engaging in the unauthorized practice of law during 1990, after he had been suspended by this court for violation of disciplinary rules. Following a hearing, the trial…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HedrickOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of ArbuckleOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of BenjaminOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of BridgesOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  5. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of JonesOregon Supreme Court · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to Conduct of DeversOregon Supreme Court · 1999
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of PaulsonOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of KlugeOregon Supreme Court · 2001
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of McKeeOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  5. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of SnyderOregon Supreme Court · 2010

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API