Legal Opinion

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Bridges

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 20, 1986No. OSB 84-42, 84-66, 84-108, 84-123 and 84-124; SC S33119PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

The Oregon State Bar charges one of its members with multiple violations of several disciplinary rules. The accused did not respond to the Bar’s complaint and notice to answer and failed to appear either personally or by counsel before a trial panel of the Disciplinary Board. After the Bar presented its evidence, the panel found the accused guilty of all but three of the violations charged and concluded that the accused should be disbarred. Having reviewed the record for ourselves, we reach the same findings and conclusion.

The Bar’s complaint charged 26 violations in seven causes of complaint…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of BristowOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of BridgesOregon Supreme Court · 1984

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HawsOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State ex rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. BourneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of BrandtOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HedgesOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  5. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of KnappenbergerOregon Supreme Court · 2008

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API