Legal Opinion

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Jones

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided August 29, 1989No. OSB 87-43; SC 24730PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

In this lawyer disciplinary proceeding, the accused agreed to let Delores McElmurry, a nonlawyer, use his name as lawyer on papers she filed in her dissolution processing operation. The issues raised by the bar’s appeal from the trial panel’s decision are whether the accused acted with a culpable mental state and, if so, whether the previously imposed sanction should be increased.

The trial panel found that in the course of his participation with McElmurry in her unauthorized practice of law, the accused violated several disciplinary rules (DRs). It recommended two years unsupervised probation…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of ChandlerOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of WillerOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of EadsOregon Supreme Court · 1987

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HawsOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State ex rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. BourneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of MorinOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Mississippi Bar v. ThompsonMississippi Supreme Court · 2008
  5. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of JonesOregon Supreme Court · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API