Legal Opinion

Cherry v. Home Savings & Loan Assn.

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 30, 1969No. Civ. 33439PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

amend, respondent’s general demurrer to appellants’ first amended complaint. This appeal is taken from the ensuing order of dismissal entered pursuant to the provisions of Code of Civil Procedure, section 581, subdivision 3.

The following facts are taken from appellants’ first amended complaint: In 1964 appellants Orrin and Resellen Wickershim, husband and wife, executed a promissory note secured by a deed of trust on certain real property in favor of respondent, Home Savings & Loan Association. In 1967 appellant Tom Cherry desired to purchase the property from the Wickershims. A contract was…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Comunale v. Traders & General InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Maguire v. Hibernia Savings & Loan SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Columbia Pictures Corp. v. DeTothCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Bennett v. Hibernia BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Coast Bank v. MinderhoutCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. La Sala v. American Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Wellenkamp v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Farmers Ins. Exchange v. ZerinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  4. Tucker v. Lassen Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Crockett v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API