Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Gerhard v. Stephens

California Supreme Court

Decided July 9, 1968No. Docket Nos. S.F. 21805, 21806, 21807, 21808PublishedCited by 101 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTobriner, J.

Plaintiffs brought these four actions to quiet title to undivided mineral interests underlying section 31, township 16 south, range 11 east, Mt. Diablo base and meridian, in San Benito County (section 31). They claimed these interests as successors of stockholders in two now-defunct corporations, Ashurst Oil, Land and Development Company (Ashurst) and California Oil Products Company (COP), which obtained specified mineral rights in section 31 in 1910.

Joseph Gerhard (Gerhard), plaintiff in S.F. 21805, Ira Solomon and others (Solomon), plaintiffs in S.F. 21807, and Herbert Mettler and others…

2Cases cited134 opinions

  1. Daar v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Maguire v. Hibernia Savings & Loan SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Texas Company v. W.H. DaughertyTexas Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Lewis & Queen v. N. M. Ball SonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Masterson v. SineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968

129 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by101 opinions

  1. City of San Jose v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Jones v. H. F. Ahmanson & Co.California Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Peterson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Conti v. Board of Civil Service CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. ZuckermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987

96 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API