Legal Opinion

Hannula v. Hacienda Homes, Inc.

California Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1949No. S. F. 17747PublishedCited by 80 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment for the defendant in an action for declaratory relief. The plaintiff is the owner of a portion of Lot 47 in the residential subdivision of Orinda Park Terrace in Contra Costa County. At one time the entire lot was owned by plaintiff’s parents who built a residence on a portion of the lot and then sold that portion to a person not a party to this action. The remaining portion was retained by plaintiff’s parents and later transferred to plaintiff. Upon offering her property for sale, plaintiff learned that defendant Hacienda Homes, Inc., would probably assert…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Maguire v. Hibernia Savings & Loan SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Werner v. GrahamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Columbia Pictures Corp. v. DeTothCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  4. California Physicians' Service v. GarrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Wing v. Forest Lawn Cemetery Assn.California Supreme Court · 1940

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by80 opinions

  1. Riss v. AngelWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Riss v. AngelWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Nahrstedt v. Lakeside Village Condominium Assn.California Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Davis v. HueyTexas Supreme Court · 1981

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API