Legal Opinion

Lowe v. Copeland

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 10, 1932No. Docket No. 8540PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

This action was one for equitable relief, namely, a decree declaring the plaintiff to be the owner of certain shares of stock in defendant American Metal Products Corporation, and enjoining defendants Copeland and the Cig-a-Lite Corporation from transferring certain patent rights. In the alternative damages were prayed, and plaintiff asked that a receiver of the business and property of defendant American Metal Products Corporation be appointed.

Defendant Copeland was the inventor of various cigar and cigarette-lighting devices, and the holder of certain patents and applications for…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Waterman v. MacKenzieSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Savings & Loan Society v. BurnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Parke v. FranciscusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Elliott v. Superior Court of Cal.California Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Lezinsky v. Mason Malt Whiskey Distilling Co.California Supreme Court · 1921

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Bainbridge v. StonerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Goes v. PerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Takahashi v. Pepper Tank & Contracting Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Bank of Am. Nat'l Trust & Sav. Ass'n v. CranstonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  5. Saracco Tank & Welding Co. v. PlatzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API