Legal Opinion

Rosenthal v. Rosenthal

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 21, 1966No. Civ. 28162, 28348PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFleming, J.

Consolidated cross-appeals from an interlocutory judgment of divorce and related orders.

Ruth and Jerome Rosenthal were married in 1943 and separated in 1959. The wife brought suit for divorce on the ground of extreme cruelty, and the husband cross-complained on the same ground. The trial court granted both parties a divorce, determined the extent of the community assets and liabilities, and appointed a receiver to liquidate the community property, pay the community debts, and divide the proceeds. Both parties appeal. (See Rosenthal v. Rosenthal, 197 Cal.App.2d 289 [17 Cal.Rptr. 186].)

1. In…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Vai v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Hall v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Pearson v. NortonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  4. Hunter v. HunterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  5. Rosenthal v. RosenthalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of FonsteinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. City of Newport Beach v. SasseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  3. Kenworthy v. HaddenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  4. Dotson v. GriceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1982
  5. In Re Marriage of ClarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API