Loeffler v. Wright
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Contra Costa County. Wm. S. Wells, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
Several diverse and somewhat uncorrelated acts alleged to be fraudulent are made apparently the basis of appellant’s claim for relief and much evidentiary matter is pleaded in the second amended complaint, but it is con-' tended by him that “There is only one cause of action set forth therein, and that is to have plaintiff’s lease and option to purchase declared valid and superior to the claims of all the other defendants, and for damages for depriving plaintiff of the possession of said land so leased and covered by his option to purchase and the valuable improvements thereon including his…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Mueller v. NugentSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- In Re Watts and SachsSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Kleinclaus v. DutardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Stewart v. DouglassCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Dukes v. KelloggCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Chapman v. Skype, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2013
- Alfaro v. Community Housing Improvement System & Planning Assn., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
- Banerian v. O'MALLEYCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Lawrence v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Clausells Armstrong v. SalasSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1937
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.