Dukes v. Kellogg
California Supreme Court
APPEAL fro-m a judgment of the Superior Court of Alameda County. John Ellsworth, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.
The question presented by this appeal arises upon the sufficiency of the complaint. Plaintiff alleges, among other matters, that he and defendants Babcock and Calvin W. Kellogg (now deceased) formed a partnership under the firm name of the "Oakland Institute” for the treatment and cure of the alcohol, opium, morphine, and tobacco habits; that it was agreed that the plaintiff should hold the position of medical director of the partnership at a monthly salary of one hundred and fifty dollars, payable from the moneys received from patients and patrons of the partnership; that under this…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Ross v. CornellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
3Cited by28 opinions
- Chicago Title Insurance v. Great Western Financial Corp.California Supreme Court · 1968
- Kleinclaus v. DutardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Ruinello v. MurrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Freeman v. SAN DIEGO ASSN. OF REALTORSCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Cooper v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.