Legal Opinion
Lawrence v. Bank of America
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 7, 1985No. A016107PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WHITE, P. J.
Nick Lawrence, plaintiff below, appeals from an order sustaining respondents’ demurrer to his complaint without leave to amend, and dismissing the action with prejudice. We affirm.
For purposes of this appeal, those factual allegations of the complaint which are properly pleaded are deemed admitted by respondent’s demurrer. (White v. Davis (1975) 13 Cal.3d 757, 765 [120 Cal.Rptr. 94, 533 P.2d 222].) The first cause of appellant’s second amended complaint alleges that he was a customer of respondent Bank of America (the Bank), and had a checking account, No. 5575-9858, at the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- White v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Wise v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1963
- Routh v. QuinnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Berkeley Police Assn. v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. San Francisco BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Union Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Jenkins v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.California Court of Appeal · 2013
- Price v. Wells Fargo BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Oaks Management Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Casterson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.