Legal Opinion
Chapman v. Skype, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 4, 2013No. B241398PublishedCited by 81 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CROSKEY, J.
Melissa Chapman, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, appeals the dismissal of her class action complaint against Skype Inc. (Skype) after the sustaining of a demurrer without leave to amend. She alleges that Skype advertises its voice over Internet protocol calling plans as “Unlimited” when, in fact, the plans are limited as to the number of minutes per day and month and the number of calls per day. She contends she has adequately alleged counts for violation of the unfair competition law (UCL) (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 17200 et seq.), the false advertising…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Kwikset Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
- In Re Tobacco II CasesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
- Lazar v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- Engalla v. Permanente Medical Group, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1997
- Aubry v. Tri-City Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by81 opinions
- Tamara Moore v. Mars Petcare US, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Daniels v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2016
- Jerald Friedman v. Aarp, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Utts v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- Ehret v. Uber Technologies, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2014
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.