United States v. International Forwarding Co.
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Appeal from Board of Unitsd States General Appraisers, Abstract 35337 (T. D. 34378).
1Opinion of the Court
De Vries, Judge,
delivered tbe opinion of tbe court:
Tbe merchandise was reported to tbe collector by tbe appraiser at tbe port of Chicago, whereat it was imported, to consist of “certain white-metal guard chains set with imitation precious stones,” and was returned by tbe collector as certain “necklaces” reported by tbe appraiser as stated. They were assessed for duty by the collector under the provisions of tbe first part of paragraph 448 of tbe tariff act of 1909, which reads:
Chains, pins, collar, cuff, and dress buttons, charms, combs, millinery and military ornaments, together with all…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Rosenberger v. GuthmanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
- United States v. Goldberg's SonsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
- Guthman v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
- United States v. FloryCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
- Wolff v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- American Bead Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
- Greatrex, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954
- United States v. BorgfeldtCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
- United States v. European Watch & Clock Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1922
- United States v. BartiromoCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1919
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.