Legal Opinion

Guthman v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 17, 1912No. 865PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, G. A. 7330 (T. D. 32281).

1Opinion of the Court

De Vries, Judge,

delivered tbe opinion of tbe court:

This appeal was briefed, argued, and submitted for decision with United States v. Guthman, Solomons & Co. (3 Ct. Cust. Appls., 276; T. D. 32572) and United States v. M. Goldberg’s Sons and H. Wolff & Co., supra (T. D. 32573), this day decided. The considerations bad in those two cases are applicable to this appeal and reference thereto is had.

The merchandise covered by this appeal consists of articles of personal adornment composed in chief value of brass, gilt, and set with imitation precious stones, and valued at 20 cents or more per dozen…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. VandegriftCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
  2. United States v. GuthmanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. American Bead Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
  2. Goat & Sheepskin Import Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
  3. Rosenberger v. GuthmanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
  4. United States v. European Watch & Clock Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1922
  5. United States v. American Bead Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API