United States v. Flory
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 27809 (T. D. 32297), Abstracts 27846 and 27848 (T. D. 32302).
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, Judge
The collector of customs at the port of New York classified the following goods as jewelry and assessed them for duty at 60 per cent ad valorem under the last clause of paragraph 448 of the tariff act of 1909:(1) Brooches having brass pins and made in chief value of vulcanized rubber in imitation of jet.(2) Lace pins with fancy heads and steel shafts completely gold plated and valued at less than 20 cents per dozen.(3) Brooches made of brass and valued at less than 20 cents per dozen.(4) Neck chains made of brass, plated, and valued at less than 20 cents per dozen.
The part of paragraph 448…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Robbins v. RobertsonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1888
- A. Bader & Co. v. United StatesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1902
3Cited by6 opinions
- American Bead Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
- National Hat Pin Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
- United States v. European Watch & Clock Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1922
- United States v. International Forwarding Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
- United States v. BartiromoCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1919
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.