Wolff v. United States
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Transferred from United States Circuit Court for Southern District of New York, Abstract 22013 (T. D. 30069), Abstract 22048 (T. D. 30086).
1Opinion of the CourtDe Viues, Judge
The decision in this case involves questions of fact,, as well as conclusions of law.
*12The merchandise, the subject of the decision of the Board of Gen-, eral Appraisers, consisted of a great variety of necklaces, chains, hatpins, beads, combs, slides, snaps, pendants, hearts, stones, and other kindred articles. The merchandise was in a variety of forms, and made from a variety of materials and compositions of materials. Some of the articles are partly finished and others complete.
There was no testimony introduced before the Board of General Appraisers. So far as this record shows, the…
2Cited by6 opinions
- American Bead Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
- Greatrex, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954
- United States v. BorgfeldtCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
- United States v. International Forwarding Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
- Goldhofer Fahrzeugwerk GmbH & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.