Legal Opinion

United States v. Goldberg's Sons

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 17, 1912No. 864PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 27809 (T. D. 32297).

1Opinion of the CourtDe Vries, Judge

This appeal was briefed, argued, and submitted with the case of the United States v. Guthman, Solomons & Co., supra (T. D. 32572), decided this day. It involves a construction chiefly, though not entirely, of the same provisions of law. The importation consisted of neck-chain clasps made of brass and valued at less than 72 cents per gross. They were assessed with duty at 60 per cent ad valorem as jewelry under the last provision of paragraph 448 of the tariff act of 1909, and are claimed to be dutiable at 45 per cent ad valorem under paragraph 199 of said act, which provides for articles…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Brown v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Nelson J. Elliott v. Samuel SwartwoutSupreme Court of the United States · 1836
  4. Nix v. HeddenSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  5. Cadwalader v. ZehSupreme Court of the United States · 1894

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. American Bead Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
  2. United States v. Field & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1920
  3. Starkey v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1941
  4. United States v. International Forwarding Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  5. Rosenberger v. GuthmanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API