Dittus v. Cranston
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGibson, C. J.
The Budget Act of 1958 appropriated the sum of $594,089 to be paid from the Fish and Game Preservation Fund to the Secretary of the State Board of Control.
This sum was reduced by the Governor to $350,000, and petitioner filed a claim with respondent for a warrant in that amount. Respondent rejected the claim, stating that the attorney general had advised that its validity should be determined by a court of competent jurisdiction. In this proceeding in mandamus petitioner seeks to compel respondent to honor her claim.
Two questions are presented for decision: First, is the sum appropriated to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Lundberg v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Stevenson v. ColganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Patrick v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
3Cited by26 opinions
- County of Alameda v. CarlesonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- People v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- Corning Hospital District v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Schabarum v. California LegislatureCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Chas. L. Harney, Inc. v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.