Legal Opinion

Dittus v. Cranston

California Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1959No. Sac. 7096PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, C. J.

The Budget Act of 1958 appropriated the sum of $594,089 to be paid from the Fish and Game Preservation Fund to the Secretary of the State Board of Control.

This sum was reduced by the Governor to $350,000, and petitioner filed a claim with respondent for a warrant in that amount. Respondent rejected the claim, stating that the attorney general had advised that its validity should be determined by a court of competent jurisdiction. In this proceeding in mandamus petitioner seeks to compel respondent to honor her claim.

Two questions are presented for decision: First, is the sum appropriated to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lundberg v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Stevenson v. ColganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Patrick v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. County of Alameda v. CarlesonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. People v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Corning Hospital District v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Schabarum v. California LegislatureCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  5. Chas. L. Harney, Inc. v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API